GHSA-p73f-w79w-jqr5: OpenClaw: Native command authorization could skip owner-command enforcement
In OpenClaw 2026.5.5 and earlier, native command authorization could skip the owner-only command policy. A sender who could trigger native command handling could run a command reserved for the owner. Fixed in openclaw 2026.5.6.
Published Jul 2, 2026 · Analysis Oct 25, 2026
What an attacker can do
OpenClaw lets operators mark some commands as owner-only. For native commands, the authorization step in affected versions did not apply that owner-command enforcement. A sender who reached native command handling could therefore authorize a command that policy meant only for the owner.
The attacker needs to be a sender on a channel that reaches native command handling, with low privileges. They send an owner-style native command and it is accepted. The CVSS vector scores high integrity impact and low confidentiality and availability impact, so the effect is unauthorized actions, not full takeover. Which actions depends on which commands your deployment keeps owner-only. The advisory does not name them or the configuration key.
The advisory keeps the trusted-operator model unchanged and says impact depends on the configuration and on whether lower-trust input can reach the path. Gateways shared among several users, or connected to group channels, are the most exposed.
Who is affected
The npm package openclaw at 2026.5.5 and earlier, with native commands enabled and reachable by senders who are not the owner.
npm ls openclawUse npm ls -g openclaw for a global install. Versions up to 2026.5.5 are affected.
openclaw
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- <= 2026.5.5
- Fixed in
- 2026.5.6
- Check
npm ls openclaw
How to fix it
Upgrade to [email protected], the first stable patched version:
npm install [email protected]Until then, the advisory says to keep native command surfaces limited to trusted senders. It also advises narrow channel and tool allowlists, not sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disabling the feature when it is not needed.
How to tell if you were hit
Review Gateway and channel history for native commands that you configured as owner-only and that were issued by senders other than the owner. Check for settings or state that changed after such messages. The advisory gives no log string, so compare the commands that ran against your owner-only policy.
Original advisory
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
Native command authorization could skip owner-command enforcement. In affected versions, a sender able to trigger native command handling could authorize a native command without enforcing the configured owner-only command policy.
This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.
Impact
When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could run an owner-style command from a sender that should not have that command access. Practical impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.
Patched Versions
The first stable patched version is 2026.5.6.
Mitigations
keep native command surfaces limited to trusted senders until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.
Credited to zsxsoft, KeenSecurityLab, qclawer.
Questions
- Which OpenClaw version fixes this?
2026.5.6 is the first stable patched version. Versions up to 2026.5.5 are affected.
- Is there a CVE for it?
No CVE appears in the data. It is tracked as GHSA-p73f-w79w-jqr5.
- What can I do before upgrading?
Limit native command surfaces to trusted senders, as the advisory says, and keep channel and tool allowlists narrow.
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology
More OpenClaw vulnerabilities
All OpenClaw entriesCVE-2026-62197
OpenClaw: Browser CDP discovery could accept blocked WebSocket URLs
medium8.5Oct 21, 2026CVE-2026-35630
OpenClaw: QQBot native approval buttons did not enforce configured approver identity
high8.0Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53806
OpenClaw: Combined POSIX shell options could confuse exec revalidation
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53809
OpenClaw: Embedded runner policy could be confused by provider aliases
medium3.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53810
OpenClaw's marketplace runtime extension metadata could point at unscanned payloads
high8.8Jul 2, 2026CVE-2026-53811
OpenClaw: Matrix allowFrom could bind to mutable display names
high8.8Jul 2, 2026
