NewApp Monitoring is liveSign up free
AgentbeamBeta
AI agent vulnerability · OpenClaw

GHSA-p73f-w79w-jqr5: OpenClaw: Native command authorization could skip owner-command enforcement

highCVSS 4.0 7.2

In OpenClaw 2026.5.5 and earlier, native command authorization could skip the owner-only command policy. A sender who could trigger native command handling could run a command reserved for the owner. Fixed in openclaw 2026.5.6.

Published Jul 2, 2026 · Analysis Oct 25, 2026

What an attacker can do

OpenClaw lets operators mark some commands as owner-only. For native commands, the authorization step in affected versions did not apply that owner-command enforcement. A sender who reached native command handling could therefore authorize a command that policy meant only for the owner.

The attacker needs to be a sender on a channel that reaches native command handling, with low privileges. They send an owner-style native command and it is accepted. The CVSS vector scores high integrity impact and low confidentiality and availability impact, so the effect is unauthorized actions, not full takeover. Which actions depends on which commands your deployment keeps owner-only. The advisory does not name them or the configuration key.

The advisory keeps the trusted-operator model unchanged and says impact depends on the configuration and on whether lower-trust input can reach the path. Gateways shared among several users, or connected to group channels, are the most exposed.

Who is affected

The npm package openclaw at 2026.5.5 and earlier, with native commands enabled and reachable by senders who are not the owner.

npm ls openclaw

Use npm ls -g openclaw for a global install. Versions up to 2026.5.5 are affected.

openclaw

Ecosystem
npm
Affected
<= 2026.5.5
Fixed in
2026.5.6
Check
npm ls openclaw

How to fix it

Upgrade to [email protected], the first stable patched version:

npm install [email protected]

Until then, the advisory says to keep native command surfaces limited to trusted senders. It also advises narrow channel and tool allowlists, not sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disabling the feature when it is not needed.

How to tell if you were hit

Review Gateway and channel history for native commands that you configured as owner-only and that were issued by senders other than the owner. Check for settings or state that changed after such messages. The advisory gives no log string, so compare the commands that ran against your owner-only policy.

Original advisory

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Summary

Native command authorization could skip owner-command enforcement. In affected versions, a sender able to trigger native command handling could authorize a native command without enforcing the configured owner-only command policy.

This advisory is scoped to the named feature and configuration. It does not change OpenClaw's trusted-operator model: authenticated Gateway operators, installed plugins, and intentional local execution surfaces remain trusted unless a separate policy, approval, allowlist, sandbox, or auth boundary is crossed.

Impact

When the affected feature is enabled and reachable, this could run an owner-style command from a sender that should not have that command access. Practical impact depends on the operator's configuration and whether lower-trust input can reach that path.

Patched Versions

The first stable patched version is 2026.5.6.

Mitigations

keep native command surfaces limited to trusted senders until patched. As general hardening, keep channel and tool allowlists narrow, avoid sharing one Gateway between mutually untrusted users, and disable the affected feature when it is not needed.

Credited to zsxsoft, KeenSecurityLab, qclawer.

Questions

Which OpenClaw version fixes this?

2026.5.6 is the first stable patched version. Versions up to 2026.5.5 are affected.

Is there a CVE for it?

No CVE appears in the data. It is tracked as GHSA-p73f-w79w-jqr5.

What can I do before upgrading?

Limit native command surfaces to trusted senders, as the advisory says, and keep channel and tool allowlists narrow.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology

More OpenClaw vulnerabilities

All OpenClaw entries