NewApp Monitoring is liveSign up free
AgentbeamBeta
AI agent vulnerability · Open WebUI

CVE-2026-88000: Open WebUI: Any authenticated user can hang the server via message deletion in a cyclic chat tree

mediumCVSS 3.1 6.5GHSA-3cgp-3cqx-j8w2

Open WebUI 0.10.0 through 0.11.0 can be frozen by any logged-in user. Deleting a message from a chat whose messages list each other as children sends the server into an infinite loop on its event loop, so every request from every user stalls. The fix is 0.11.1.

Published Sep 9, 2026 · Analysis Oct 24, 2026

What an attacker can do

Open WebUI stores chat history as unvalidated JSON. After a message is deleted through DELETE /api/v1/chats/{id}/messages/{message_id}, the helper in backend/open_webui/models/chats.py picks the chat's new current message by walking down childrenIds to the deepest child. It never records where it has been, so two messages that name each other as children loop forever.

The attacker needs one account with the default user role. They create a chat of about 300 bytes with a childrenIds cycle through POST /api/v1/chats/new, then delete one message. The loop runs synchronously on the asyncio event loop, so unauthenticated /health, admin endpoints and the UI all hang. Health checks and liveness probes fail. The request keeps running after the client disconnects, so one fire-and-forget call is enough.

The loop pins one CPU core with flat memory, so no out-of-memory kill rescues the process. Someone has to kill it. The malformed chat stays in the database, so deleting a message from it again re-arms the hang. No data is disclosed or changed.

Who is affected

Open WebUI from 0.10.0 up to and including 0.11.0 is affected. Earlier versions are not, because the message-deletion endpoint and the affected code did not exist. No non-default setting is needed. Any deployment where users can create chats is exposed.

pip show open-webui

For Docker deployments, check the image tag you run.

open-webui

Ecosystem
PyPI
Affected
>= 0.10.0, < 0.11.1
Fixed in
0.11.1
Check
pip show open-webui

How to fix it

Upgrade to 0.11.1.

pip install --upgrade open-webui

The fix, in commit b933292, records the ids the walk has already visited, so it stops after at most one step per stored message. Chats already stored with a cycle become harmless after the upgrade, and you do not need to delete them. The advisory lists no workaround.

How to tell if you were hit

Look for a worker pinned at 100% of one core with flat memory and a failing /health check. Then check access logs for a DELETE /api/v1/chats/{id}/messages/{message_id} request that never completed, from a non-admin account, shortly after a POST /api/v1/chats/new.

To find the cause, inspect stored chats for history objects where a message's childrenIds points back to one of its ancestors. A restart clears the hang until someone deletes a message from that chat again.

Original advisory

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Summary

Chat histories are stored as an unvalidated JSON object. After a message is deleted, the code that picks the chat's new current message walked down the childrenIds links without recording where it had already been. Any account with the default user role could store a chat whose messages list each other as children, then delete a message from it, and the walk would run forever. That walk runs on the server's request loop, so it blocks every other user's requests until the process is killed.

Preconditions

One account with the default user role. No administrator rights, no additional permissions, no configuration change and no non-default setting: creating and deleting chats is available to every user out of the box. The attack runs entirely against the attacker's own chat, so no knowledge of any other user's data is needed. Versions before 0.10.0 are unaffected because neither the message-deletion endpoint nor the affected code existed.

Impact

The walk is synchronous and runs on the asyncio event loop, so while it spins, every request from every user is blocked, including unauthenticated /health and administrator endpoints. External health checks and orchestrator liveness probes fail alongside the UI. This is a pure CPU pin with no list growth, so a worker consumes one full core with flat memory and has to be killed rather than being reclaimed by an out-of-memory kill. The work is not cancelled when the client disconnects, so a single fire-and-forget request is enough and the attacker can disconnect immediately. The malformed chat stays in the database, so the condition re-arms on the next deletion attempt against that chat. No data is disclosed, altered or deleted.

Fix

Fixed in 0.11.1 by https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/commit/b933292d63d12be3fd1416fe55519ddc7aa336bc. The walk now records the ids it has already passed through, so it terminates after at most one step per stored message whatever the message contents are. Upgrading fully resolves the issue, including for chats stored while the deployment was on an affected version, which become harmless once the walk terminates.

Root cause

Affected component: the chat-history message deletion helper in backend/open_webui/models/chats.py, reached from DELETE /api/v1/chats/{id}/messages/{message_id}. Affected setup: all builds from 0.10.0 up to and including 0.11.0.

Resolving the chat's new current message after a deletion means descending to the deepest remaining child, and that descent had no notion of where it had already been, so two messages naming each other as children sent it back and forth indefinitely. The write path does not validate the structure of a chat's history, and the child-link rebuild that runs on other write paths does not apply when a chat is created, so a history whose childrenIds form a cycle was persisted exactly as submitted.

Proof of concept

As a default-role user on a running instance, store one chat of roughly 300 bytes whose messages reference each other as children:

{"chat":{"title":"poc","history":{"currentId":"C","messages":{
  "A":{"id":"A","parentId":null,"role":"user","content":"a","childrenIds":["B","C"],"timestamp":1},
  "B":{"id":"B","parentId":"A","role":"assistant","content":"b","childrenIds":["A"],"timestamp":2},
  "C":{"id":"C","parentId":"A","role":"user","content":"c","childrenIds":[],"timestamp":3}}}}}

POST /api/v1/chats/new stores it verbatim, with the child links unchanged. A single DELETE /api/v1/chats/{id}/messages/C as the same user then never returns:

   unauthenticated GET /health -> HTTP 000 after 10.007s
   DELETE -> HTTP 000 after 20.007s

Sampled during the hang, the worker had consumed 42.9 seconds of CPU on one fully occupied core with flat resident memory, and unauthenticated GET /health timed out for as long as the process lived, including after the attacker's connection closed.

On 0.11.1 the same payload returns HTTP 200 in 0.011s, /health stays available throughout, and deleting a middle message from a well-formed four-message chain still resolves the current message correctly.

Credits

@Classic298, who found the unguarded descent through the chat's child links, demonstrated the resulting server-wide outage end to end against a live instance, and supplied the fix.

Credited to Classic298.

Questions

Does exploiting this need admin rights?

No. Any account with the default user role can do it, with no configuration change. The attack runs entirely against the attacker's own chat.

Is Open WebUI 0.9.x affected by this cycle-deletion bug?

No. Versions before 0.10.0 are unaffected because the message-deletion endpoint did not exist. Another advisory, CVE-2026-88002, covers a different cycle bug that reaches back to 0.5.0.

Does a restart fix the hang?

Only temporarily. The cyclic chat stays in the database, and the next deletion against it hangs the process again. Upgrading to 0.11.1 is the fix.

Does it leak data?

No. The advisory describes only a denial of service. No data is disclosed, altered or deleted.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology

More Open WebUI vulnerabilities

All Open WebUI entries