NewApp Monitoring is liveSign up free
AgentbeamBeta
AI agent vulnerability · Other MCP servers and tools

CVE-2026-77261: MCP Atlassian: SSRF redirect protection missing for basic-auth and OAuth authentication branches

highCVSS 3.1 7.1GHSA-6529-c226-h328

In mcp-atlassian before 0.22.0, the redirect SSRF guard is attached only for header-PAT authentication. Sessions using basic auth or OAuth follow redirects to private addresses such as the cloud metadata endpoint. Upgrade to 0.22.0.

Published Sep 22, 2026 · Analysis Oct 22, 2026

What an attacker can do

_make_ssrf_safe_hook() checks each 3xx response and rejects a Location pointing at a private IP through validate_url_for_ssrf(). In servers/dependencies.py, three branches build a fetcher through _create_and_validate(). Only the header-PAT branch passes attach_ssrf_hook=True. The default is False, so the basic and oauth_pat branches run without the hook. This is an incomplete fix of GHSA-7r34-79r5-rcc9.

The reporter's check on v0.21.1 showed no hooks on a basic-auth session, while the header-PAT hook raised "Redirect blocked (SSRF): Blocked IP address: 169.254.169.254 (non-global)".

To exploit it, the attacker must control or compromise the Atlassian server the MCP server connects to. That server answers a request with a 302 whose Location points at the metadata path for IAM security credentials on 169.254.169.254, and the session follows it. The attacker can then reach cloud metadata, an internal Kubernetes API, databases or other services reachable from the MCP host. Basic auth and OAuth cover most production Cloud setups, so most HTTP-mode multi-user deployments are in scope. The CVSS vector rates attack complexity high for this reason.

Who is affected

mcp-atlassian below 0.22.0 where Jira or Confluence connections use basic auth or OAuth. Header-PAT connections already had the hook. Highest risk is HTTP-mode multi-user servers that run in cloud networks where metadata endpoints are reachable.

pip show mcp-atlassian

mcp-atlassian

Ecosystem
PyPI
Affected
< 0.22.0
Fixed in
0.22.0
Check
pip show mcp-atlassian

How to fix it

Upgrade to 0.22.0:

pip install --upgrade mcp-atlassian==0.22.0

The reporter notes the underlying change is one line per branch: pass attach_ssrf_hook=True to _create_and_validate() in branches 2 and 3. The advisory gives no other workaround. As defense in depth, enforce IMDSv2 and block egress from the MCP host to internal ranges.

How to tell if you were hit

On the MCP host, check egress and proxy logs for requests to 169.254.169.254 or internal ranges that originate from the mcp-atlassian process. A 3xx response from an Atlassian URL followed by a request to a private address is the signature. On AWS, review CloudTrail for use of the instance role from unexpected addresses. Beam is not relevant to this flaw.

Original advisory

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Summary

_make_ssrf_safe_hook() blocks HTTP redirects to private/internal IPs by validating the Location header before the client follows a 3xx response. The problem is that this hook is only attached in one of three authentication branches — the header-PAT path. Basic auth and OAuth branches skip it entirely, so if the connected Atlassian server returns a redirect to something like http://169.254.169.254/, the requests session follows it without complaint.

This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-7r34-79r5-rcc9. The hook works fine when it's there — it just isn't there for most production auth configurations.

Details

In src/mcp_atlassian/servers/dependencies.py, three branches construct a fetcher and call _create_and_validate(). Only Branch 1 passes attach_ssrf_hook=True:

# Branch 1 (header PAT) — hook attached
return _create_and_validate(request, spec, header_config, "header_pat",
                             attach_ssrf_hook=True)

# Branch 2 (basic auth) — hook missing
return _create_and_validate(request, spec, user_config, "basic",
                             user_email=user_email)

# Branch 3 (OAuth/PAT) — hook missing
return _create_and_validate(request, spec, user_config, "oauth_pat",
                             user_email=user_email)

attach_ssrf_hook defaults to False, so branches 2 and 3 silently skip the protection. The hook itself (_make_ssrf_safe_hook) is straightforward — it checks response.is_redirect, grabs the Location header, and calls validate_url_for_ssrf() to reject private IPs. It works correctly when present.

Typical attack flow:

  1. Attacker controls or compromises an Atlassian instance (Cloud or Server)
  2. MCP server connects using basic auth or OAuth credentials (most production setups)
  3. Atlassian returns 302 Location: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/
  4. The unprotected session follows the redirect
  5. AWS IAM credentials (or other internal service data) are returned to the attacker

PoC

Tested on commit d8bc786 (v0.21.1). No real credentials needed.

from unittest.mock import MagicMock
import requests

from mcp_atlassian.servers.dependencies import _make_ssrf_safe_hook
from mcp_atlassian.utils.urls import validate_url_for_ssrf
from mcp_atlassian.jira import JiraFetcher
from mcp_atlassian.jira.config import JiraConfig

config = JiraConfig(
    url="https://attacker.atlassian.net",
    auth_type="basic",
    username="[email protected]",
    api_token="victim-token",
)
fetcher = JiraFetcher(config=config)
session = fetcher.jira._session

hooks = session.hooks.get("response", [])
print("hooks on basic-auth session:", [h.__name__ for h in hooks] or "none")

fake_redirect = MagicMock(spec=requests.Response)
fake_redirect.is_redirect = True
fake_redirect.headers = {"Location": "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"}

blocked = False
for h in hooks:
    try:
        h(fake_redirect)
    except ValueError as e:
        blocked = True
        print("blocked:", e)

if not blocked:
    print("redirect to 169.254.169.254 not blocked on basic-auth session")

# show header-PAT branch does block it
hook = _make_ssrf_safe_hook(validate_url_for_ssrf)
try:
    hook(fake_redirect)
except ValueError as e:
    print("header-PAT branch blocks:", e)

Output:

$ uv run python3 /tmp/test.py
hooks on basic-auth session: none
redirect to 169.254.169.254 not blocked on basic-auth session
header-PAT branch blocks: Redirect blocked (SSRF): Blocked IP address: 169.254.169.254 (non-global)

Impact

Basic auth and OAuth cover most production Atlassian Cloud deployments, so this affects the majority of HTTP-mode multi-user setups. An attacker with control over the Atlassian server can redirect MCP server requests to internal infrastructure — cloud metadata endpoints, internal Kubernetes API, databases, or any service reachable from the MCP server's network.

The fix is one line per affected branch: pass attach_ssrf_hook=True to _create_and_validate() in branches 2 and 3, the same way branch 1 already does.

Credited to hewei-gikaku.

Questions

Which authentication modes were protected?

Only header PAT. Basic auth and OAuth sessions lacked the redirect hook, because attach_ssrf_hook defaults to False.

Does the attacker need to be on my network?

No. They need control of the Atlassian server the MCP server talks to, so the MCP server follows its redirect into your internal network.

Is this related to GHSA-7r34-79r5-rcc9?

Yes. The advisory calls it an incomplete fix of that SSRF issue, since the working hook was not attached on two of three paths.

Is a proof of concept public?

The advisory includes a mock-based script that shows the missing hook on a basic-auth session. No in-the-wild exploitation is reported.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. The analysis is written by an AI model from the sources listed above and checked by automated rules before it is published. Check versions against the vendor's advisory before you act. Methodology

More Other MCP servers and tools vulnerabilities

All Other MCP servers and tools entries