CVE-2026-44220: ciguard: discover_pipeline_files follows symlinks out of scan root
Summary The discoverpipelinefiles() function in src/ciguard/discovery.py (introduced in v0.8.0 and used by the MCP scanrepo tool shipped in v0.8.1) walks a directory tree following symlinks, with cycle protection via tracking visited resolved paths.
Published May 5, 2026 · Updated May 15, 2026
Affected packages
ciguard
- Ecosystem
- PyPI
- Affected
- >= 0.8.0, <= 0.8.1
- Fixed in
- 0.8.2
- Check
pip show ciguard
Advisory details
From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).
Summary
The discover_pipeline_files() function in src/ciguard/discovery.py (introduced in v0.8.0 and used by the MCP scan_repo tool shipped in v0.8.1) walks a directory tree following symlinks, with cycle protection via tracking visited resolved paths. An attacker who can plant a symlink in a directory the user (or AI agent) scans can cause discovery to walk into the symlink target and return paths to pipeline-shaped files outside the requested root.
Threat scenario
MCP confused-deputy. A user runs Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Cursor with the ciguard MCP server registered. The agent is fed an adversarial prompt to scan a directory containing planted symlinks (e.g. via a malicious clone or extracted tarball). ciguard.scan_repo walks the symlinks, returning paths and (via subsequent scan calls) file content from ~/.aws/, ~/.config/, /etc/some-pipeline-config/, etc. Pipeline files often contain hardcoded secrets, internal hostnames, deploy keys.
Patch
- New
follow_symlinks: bool = Falseparameter ondiscover_pipeline_files. Default refuses to descend into symlinked directories OR symlinked files. - Belt-and-braces: results are filtered to those whose
.resolve()lies underroot.resolve(), applied even when callers opt in tofollow_symlinks=True. - 3 regression tests in
tests/test_discovery.py::TestSymlinkSafety.
Discovery
Found during ciguard's first self-conducted penetration test cycle (PTES + OWASP TG v4.2 + CREST framing), 2026-04-26.
CVSS Scoring
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N— 4.4 (Medium) - CVSS v4.0:
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N— first.org calc 5.7 (Medium); GitHub's calc returns 2.4 (Low). Vector is correct — calculator profiles differ.
Reproduction
from pathlib import Path
from ciguard.discovery import discover_pipeline_files
# In a victim dir, plant: trojan -> /etc
# (or any other accessible dir containing pipeline-shaped files)
for f in discover_pipeline_files(Path('/tmp/victim')):
print(f) # pre-fix: includes paths under /etc; post-fix: only /tmp/victim/References
- Fix released in v0.8.2
- CI regression gate added in v0.8.3
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44220
See also: GHSA-w828-4qhx-vxx3 — same conceptual pattern (path-validation flaw in an AI-agent tool) in Claude SDK for Python, CWE-59 + CWE-367
References
How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology
More Other MCP servers and tools vulnerabilities
All Other MCP servers and tools entriesCVE-2026-77361
obsidian-tc : Symlink read-ACL scope bypass via lexical path checks
medium4.7Oct 23, 2026CVE-2026-114126
Storybook dev server vulnerable to code injection from the local network
high8.7Oct 22, 2026CVE-2026-113731
djust: Arbitrary absolute-path file read in the find_handlers_for_template MCP tool
low3.3Oct 21, 2026CVE-2026-114125
Storybook: Missing origin validation in Storybook preview allows code injection from malicious websites
critical9.4Oct 21, 2026CVE-2026-111770
MCP TypeScript server SDK: Shared transport or server instances delivered one HTTP client's messages to another
high7.7Oct 20, 2026GHSA-953h-535j-jg2v
agent-router: MCP session resume does not verify the embedded anti-hijacking subject; default Helm seed makes session IDs forgeable
medium6.8Oct 19, 2026
